Is it possible that astrology is wrong?

The main reason astrological signs don't align with the zodiac, however, is an oscillation in the Earth's axis of rotation called precession. As a result of its rotation, the Earth swells slightly at the equator, not unlike how a skater's skirt opens as she turns.

Is it possible that astrology is wrong?

The main reason astrological signs don't align with the zodiac, however, is an oscillation in the Earth's axis of rotation called precession. As a result of its rotation, the Earth swells slightly at the equator, not unlike how a skater's skirt opens as she turns. Astrology consists of a series of belief systems that hold that there is a relationship between astronomical phenomena and events or descriptions of personality in the human world. The scientific community has rejected astrology because it has no explanatory power to describe the universe.

Scientific evidence has not found evidence to support the premises or supposed effects described in astrological traditions. Carlson was very careful in designing the study, ensuring that it conformed to both the requirements of the scientific and astrological community. From Quinean's network of knowledge, there is a dichotomy in which one must reject astrology or accept astrology, but reject all established scientific disciplines that are incompatible with astrology. Astrology had its heyday in the Mediterranean in the Hellenistic period, an era that took place between the 3rd century BC.

C. and the 1st century AD. Throughout its history, astrology has been regarded as a science, an art and a form of divinatory magic. Other astrologers do not try to explain a causal agent, simply saying that the field cannot be essentially investigated, they classify astrology as a form of divination, a supernatural force in action.

Even if an astrological configuration means problems, the modern astrologer will describe it as an “opportunity for growth, as if they were a condescending intermediate administrator. Worse still, the enriching approach taken by psychologists has contaminated modern astrology with diluted interpretations that seek to protect its clients. Gauquelin set out to analyze astrology scientifically, and his results came out strongly against his profession. So there is no theoretical basis for astrology, no practical results, and yet, sometimes astrologers seem to get it right.

Unlike scientific disciplines, astrology does not respond to falsification through experimentation. Modern scientific research in astrology focuses primarily on establishing a correlation between astrological traditions and the influence of seasonal birth on humans. But discarding all astrology directly undermines the ideas that ancient practitioners may have had ideas that are impossible to access from our concrete jungles, perpetual digital connectivity and space exploration. The contemporary flavor of astrology has a closer relationship with the social science of psychology than the observational science on which it used to be based.

The above-mentioned interpretations of Bhavat Bhavam can baffle any astrology student as some of the postulates related to astrology are still unjustified.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *